Comments on: REALLY good C++ training? http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2006/11/09/really-good-c-training/ messy things Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:58:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: rmn http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2006/11/09/really-good-c-training/comment-page-1/#comment-190863 rmn Sun, 01 Nov 2009 19:40:07 +0000 http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2006/11/09/really-good-c-training#comment-190863 I would suggest reading online.. Blogs are a good place to start imo, like the one I'm writing (should be linked with my name). Good luck, Roman. I would suggest reading online.. Blogs are a good place to start imo, like the one I’m writing (should be linked with my name).

Good luck,
Roman.

]]> By: Paul Buis http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2006/11/09/really-good-c-training/comment-page-1/#comment-170068 Paul Buis Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:14:04 +0000 http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2006/11/09/really-good-c-training#comment-170068 No "good" training is available on C++ because it is simply not possible to grok C++ in just a week. It is just too complex and ugly. That is why we no longer teach freshman how to program in C++ (we use Java here). Training for someone who is passingly familiar with C++ to take them to the next level doesn't generate enough of a market to be offered. Any one bright enough to want it can probably slug through a few Scott Meyers books anyway and not need it. No “good” training is available on C++ because it is simply not possible to grok C++ in just a week. It is just too complex and ugly. That is why we no longer teach freshman how to program in C++ (we use Java here).

Training for someone who is passingly familiar with C++ to take them to the next level doesn’t generate enough of a market to be offered. Any one bright enough to want it can probably slug through a few Scott Meyers books anyway and not need it.

]]>