<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A refinement to rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2005/01/19/a-refinement-to-rel-nofollow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2005/01/19/a-refinement-to-rel-nofollow/</link>
	<description>messy things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 05:07:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2005/01/19/a-refinement-to-rel-nofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-18121</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1295#comment-18121</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m still waiting to see what the &quot;official&quot; nofollow implementation is going to look like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still waiting to see what the &#8220;official&#8221; nofollow implementation is going to look like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin</title>
		<link>http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2005/01/19/a-refinement-to-rel-nofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-18119</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1295#comment-18119</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an excellent idea. I&#039;d use a plugin for that in an instant.

So do you have a download for us? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an excellent idea. I&#8217;d use a plugin for that in an instant.</p>
<p>So do you have a download for us? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2005/01/19/a-refinement-to-rel-nofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-17598</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 03:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1295#comment-17598</guid>
		<description>Yup, and a &quot;this comment is OK&quot; button that only I can push that skips the 10 days for a first time, legit poster.  But a white-list would be tricky because if spammers knew that&#039;s how things worked they could spoof it.  I guess there could be a cookie or something.

But I don&#039;t think it&#039;s that bad to make people wait 10 days for their pagerank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, and a &#8220;this comment is OK&#8221; button that only I can push that skips the 10 days for a first time, legit poster.  But a white-list would be tricky because if spammers knew that&#8217;s how things worked they could spoof it.  I guess there could be a cookie or something.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that bad to make people wait 10 days for their pagerank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2005/01/19/a-refinement-to-rel-nofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-17585</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1295#comment-17585</guid>
		<description>Another next refinement would seem to be a sort of white-listing. 

If you&#039;ve vetted one entry from a poster to default their subsequent entries to go straight through without the nofollow from day one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another next refinement would seem to be a sort of white-listing. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve vetted one entry from a poster to default their subsequent entries to go straight through without the nofollow from day one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2005/01/19/a-refinement-to-rel-nofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-17469</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1295#comment-17469</guid>
		<description>Yup, that&#039;s the idea.  10 days from now, rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; will be removed from both of those links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, that&#8217;s the idea.  10 days from now, rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221; will be removed from both of those links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark J</title>
		<link>http://minutillo.com/steve/weblog/2005/01/19/a-refinement-to-rel-nofollow/comment-page-1/#comment-17466</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1295#comment-17466</guid>
		<description>Sounds good.  So URIs in the comment body also get the treatment? &lt;a href=&quot;http://txfx.net/&quot;&gt;test&lt;/a&gt;

I think that once this new approach has gained traction and has existed for a while, comment spam will lessen, as they start to see that it is ineffective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good.  So URIs in the comment body also get the treatment? <a href="http://txfx.net/">test</a></p>
<p>I think that once this new approach has gained traction and has existed for a while, comment spam will lessen, as they start to see that it is ineffective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

